|
Post by doc on Oct 13, 2008 10:38:48 GMT -5
Hmmm .... good thing or bad thing? And please, no homophobe responses please. Source - Click here
|
|
|
Post by GreatestPosterEver on Oct 13, 2008 10:43:19 GMT -5
They will probably still get bullied by going there. They still go home, so instead of getting bullied at school they will get bullied at home
|
|
|
Post by Acie on Oct 13, 2008 13:12:07 GMT -5
What's going to prevent people who like to harass from enrolling in this school?
And what's going to prevent students from other schools from coming there and harassing them? If anything IMO it's making them an even bigger target by having them all in one place.
Put the money into teaching and encouraging tolerance instead of excluding them altogether.
|
|
|
Post by Conqueror of the Goths on Oct 13, 2008 15:43:23 GMT -5
Segregation has never worked historically. It's really taking a step back in my opinion. For the most part, gay culture has been outright and challenging societal norms and bringing discrimination to the forefront. Doing this, is simply saying, we give up in a way and refuse to challenge these norms.
I understand that suicide amongst gay men in their teens is astongishly high, but that's our fault for not having the proper guidance/psychological counselling in place in high schools.
|
|
|
Post by Menudo on Oct 13, 2008 15:45:57 GMT -5
exactly. Isnt that called positive homophobia? You are treating them different by trying to protect them. Another kind of homophobia.
|
|
|
Post by coltrane on Oct 14, 2008 9:24:28 GMT -5
benzo and claudius are right. segregating people just reinforces the negative stereotypes. my belief is that they should use this money for education and for monitoring behaviour(aka staff protection of vulnerable students at existing schools).
|
|